Teaching for Integrity in the Age of AI with Tricia Bertram Gallant and David Rettinger


Reader, here's your weekly Teaching in Higher Ed update.

On Episode 568 of Teaching in Higher Ed, I was joined by renowned academic integrity experts Tricia Bertram Gallant and David Rettinger, co-authors of The Opposite of Cheating: Teaching for Integrity in the Age of AI. Together, they discussed why cheating has been a normal part of being human, how broader systemic pressures encouraged shortcuts, and the ways generative AI had begun to disrupt traditional approaches to assessment and academic honesty. Throughout the conversation, they shared personal stories of ethical dilemmas, reflected on how faculty could approach suspected misconduct with empathy, and emphasized the importance of shifting away from purely punitive mindsets toward fostering deeper learning and authentic engagement. The guests offered practical strategies for supporting students, rethinking assessment in response to AI, and building more resilient, integrity-driven educational environments.

Resources from the episode:

Discussion questions:

  1. Systemic Issues: Tricia discusses “doing school” and how structural factors like grade emphasis and large class sizes contribute to cheating. How might institutions reshape these systemic factors to promote integrity?
  2. Instructor Emotions: The episode explores the emotional responses faculty have when dealing with academic integrity violations. How can instructors reframe their role from “police officer” to “educator,” and why is this important?
  3. Responding to Violations: The guests recommend responding to violations as mistakes from which students can learn, rather than as moral failings. What practical steps can faculty take to apply this mindset in their courses?
  4. Assessment Security Theater: Tricia references "assessment security theater"—efforts that create the illusion of security. What are some examples, and how should we think differently about securing assessments?
  5. Authentic Assessment: What does “authentic assessment” mean in your discipline, and how could you align assessment more closely with your actual learning objectives in the age of AI?
  6. Institutional Policies: Why do the guests strongly advise always following institutional policy when handling academic integrity cases, and what challenges might arise if faculty “go rogue”?
  7. Personal Growth: Both guests and Bonni reflect on their own mistakes or near-mistakes with integrity. How can sharing these stories promote a healthier culture of integrity for students and colleagues?

Related Episodes

There are three episodes I would like to highlight, which relate to ethics in higher education teaching, starting with ChatGPT and Good Intentions in Higher Ed with Autumm Caines on Episode 452. She examines the complexities of integrating AI tools like ChatGPT in higher education. Autumm emphasizes the importance of intentionality, highlighting that the process of writing is a form of thinking, and cautions against outsourcing this cognitive process to AI. The discussion also touches on the ethical considerations and potential implications of AI in academic settings.

Betsy Barre joined me on Episode 548 for a conversation that explores the challenges educators face when addressing political and controversial topics in the classroom. She discusses the tension between maintaining neutrality and engaging with pressing societal issues, advocating for a more generous and understanding approach to pedagogical disagreements. The episode encourages educators to reflect on their roles and the impact of their choices in politically diverse classrooms.

On Episode 549, Designing for Justice, Rajiv Jhangiani shares insights from his work at the Inclusive Education Research Lab, focusing on open educational practices, inclusive teaching, and ethical educational technology. He discusses the importance of intentionally designing educational experiences that promote social justice and equity, and how students can perceive and be impacted by these efforts. The conversation also covers institutional strategies to ensure that new educational tools do not reinforce systemic biases.

Quotable Words

David Rettinger encourages us on Episode 568:

Take care of yourself first, whatever that looks like. You're never going to help somebody else if you're not on firm ground yourself.

Next Week’s Episode

On the upcoming episode of Teaching in Higher Ed, Mike Perkins and Jasper Roe introduce a practical framework for ethical AI integration in assessment.

Support

The money gathered via the TiHE virtual 'tip jar' helps to defray some of the costs of producing the podcast.

Read

My book: The Productive Online and Offline Professor: A Practical Guide, provides approaches to help you turn your intentions into action. I also write an advice column for EdSurge: Toward Better Teaching: Office Hours With Bonni Stachowiak

Listen

Subscribe to the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast and listen on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Overcast, Stitcher, TuneIn, or Spotify.

Share

Update: If you enjoy reading these weekly updates and would like to share them with a friend, they can sign up on the Teaching in Higher Ed updates subscribe page.

Disclosures

Affiliate income disclosure: Books that are recommended on the podcast link to the Teaching in Higher Ed bookstore on Bookshop.org. All affiliate income gets donated to the LibroMobile Arts Cooperative (LMAC), established in 2016 by Sara Rafael Garcia.”

Notice: Portions of these weekly updates are produced using CastMagic.io, which uses AI to produce a draft of the transcript, identify key quotes, highlight themes, etc.

Hi! I'm Bonni Stachowiak. Host of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast.

Each week I send an update to subscribers with the most recent episode's show notes and some other resources that don't show up on the podcast. Subscribe to the Teaching in Higher Ed weekly update.

Read more from Hi! I'm Bonni Stachowiak. Host of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast.
"What's going on with the phrase artificial intelligence is not that it means something else than what we're using it to mean, it's that it doesn't have a proper referent in the world." -Emily M. Bender

Reader, here's your weekly Teaching in Higher Ed update. On Episode 576, I welcome Dr. Emily M. Bender, professor of Linguistics at the University of Washington, and Dr. Alex Hanna, Director of Research at the Distributed AI Research Institute and lecturer at UC Berkeley’s School of Information, to Teaching in Higher Ed. We explore their new book, The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech's Hype and Create the Future We Want. Emily and Alex clarify how the term “AI” is often misapplied and...

"Education is the process of helping people find things that they don't yet know they love." Rolin Moe on Teaching in Higher Ed podcast

Reader, here's your weekly Teaching in Higher Ed update. On Episode 575, I welcome Rolin Moe, education administrator and leader in distance and digital learning, to Teaching in Higher Ed. He helps us reflect on the complexities of rebuilding trust in the value of education. Rolin shares experiences that shaped his teaching philosophy including his early days teaching students with learning disabilities and formative lessons about flexibility, responsiveness, and the limits of prescriptive...

"It's not that they're bad people, it's that they're people, they're humans. And if we're a person, we have biases." - Alex Edmans

Reader, here's your weekly Teaching in Higher Ed update. On Episode 574 of Teaching in Higher Ed, I am joined by Alex Edmonds, Professor of Finance at London Business School and expert on data interpretation and bias. We delve into the intricate ways that stories, statistics, and studies can reinforce and exploit our biases, even when the facts themselves are accurate. Alex Edmonds reflects on popular examples, from the 10,000-hour rule to the marshmallow test, illustrating how commonly...